StrategyGoogle AdsBest Practices

Audit Checklist: When to Use Account-Level vs Campaign-Level Placement Exclusions

UUnknown

2026-02-22

10 min read

A practical audit framework to choose account-level vs campaign-level placement exclusions and protect brand safety without killing reach.

Stop wasting time chasing bad placements: a practical decision framework for account-level vs campaign-level exclusions

Managing placements across dozens of campaigns, formats and automated buying strategies is one of the top time sinks for marketing teams in 2026. You need clean inventory control that protects brand safety and ROI without handcuffing automation. The right choice between account-level exclusions and campaign-level exclusions is not “always one or the other” — it’s a decision problem that, when solved, reduces wasted spend, simplifies governance and keeps machine learning working for you.

Executive summary — the quick decision

If you need a one-line answer to act on today: use account-level exclusions when you have broad, non-negotiable inventory blocks (brand safety, regulatory compliance, global blacklists) that must apply everywhere; use campaign-level exclusions when you need fine-grained control to preserve reach for specific objectives or when testing placement performance by tactic, region or audience.

This article provides a step-by-step decision framework, real-world examples and an audit checklist you can use immediately to choose the right level of placement control — and avoid common pitfalls that cost reach or introduce reporting blind spots.

Why this matters in 2026

Late 2025 and early 2026 brought two major trends that make this framework timely:

Ad platforms are consolidating controls at account-level as automation grows. For example, Google Ads announced account-level placement exclusions in January 2026 — a change designed to simplify brand safety across Performance Max, Demand Gen, YouTube and Display campaigns.
Advertisers are leaning into privacy-forward, automation-driven formats. More automation increases the risk of unexpected inventory unless you create robust guardrails that don’t undermine machine learning.

"Google Ads is adding account-level placement exclusions, letting advertisers block unwanted inventory across all campaigns from a single setting." — Search Engine Land, Jan 15, 2026

The Decision Framework: 7-step audit to choose account- vs campaign-level exclusions

Apply this framework in sequence during your next inventory audit. Each step has an action and a signal that tells you whether account-level or campaign-level exclusion is the better option.

Step 1 — Define absolute inventory bans (Compliance & Brand Safety)

Action: Create a master list of placements, categories and channels that are non-negotiable (e.g., illegal content, regulated product adjacency, or blocked YouTube channels). Consult legal, brand and privacy teams.

Signal: If any placement must be blocked across all lines of business, apply it at the account level.
Step 2 — Map campaign objectives and tolerance for reach

Action: For each campaign, document objective (awareness, lead gen, ecomm conversion), target audience, and minimal acceptable reach.

Signal: If a campaign requires maximum reach (awareness/upper funnel) avoid overly broad account-level exclusions that remove high-performing inventory. Use campaign-level exclusions to preserve reach where needed.
Step 3 — Audit placement performance historically

Action: Pull placement reports for the last 90–180 days segmented by campaign type (search vs display vs video), device and geography. Identify placements with negative ROI, high viewability but low conversions, or suspicious patterns.

Signal: Systemic underperformers across multiple campaigns justify account-level exclusion; isolated underperformers justify campaign-level exclusion and further testing.
Step 4 — Evaluate automation dependency

Action: Identify campaigns that rely on platform automation (Performance Max, Demand Gen) vs campaigns using manual bidding and placement targeting.

Signal: Automation-heavy campaigns benefit from centralized account-level guardrails to prevent spend on problematic placements that the platform might otherwise choose. But avoid overblocking; use campaign-level exclusions to fine-tune when a campaign's strategy needs it.
Step 5 — Consider geography and language nuances

Action: Flag placements that are safe or unsafe only for specific markets or languages.

Signal: Use campaign-level exclusions for region-specific adjustments; account-level exclusions should be reserved for global blocks only.
Step 6 — Plan for testing and iteration

Action: For placements you suspect are problematic but aren’t proven, create controlled tests (A/B or separate campaign buckets) with campaign-level exclusions before committing to account-level removal.

Signal: Don’t convert a temporary campaign-level exclusion into a permanent account-level exclusion without adequate evidence.
Step 7 — Governance, naming and documentation

Action: Record all exclusions (who added them, rationale, date, data backing) in a central governance doc. Use consistent naming conventions for exclusion lists.

Signal: Account-level exclusions are a governance responsibility; require cross-functional approval. Campaign-level exclusions can be delegated to campaign owners but must be logged.

Examples: Applying the framework in real scenarios

Here are three pragmatic examples that show how the framework leads to different choices.

Example A — Global CPG brand with strict brand safety

Situation: A consumer packaged goods company must avoid medical misinformation and political content globally. They also run Performance Max at scale.

Decision: Create an account-level exclusion list of categories and a publisher blacklist (YouTube channels, websites). Rationale: The risk is systemic and applies to every campaign; automation formats require consistent guardrails. Campaign-level exclusions used only for regional promotions that have specific legal constraints.

Example B — Mid-market eCommerce retailer running targeted promos

Situation: Seasonal campaigns for flash sales target niche audiences in five U.S. DMAs. Historical data shows some local sites perform poorly, but other placements drive high conversion rates.

Decision: Keep a minimal account-level blacklist focused on explicit brand safety. Use campaign-level exclusions to block local low-performing placements only for the flash-sale campaigns, preserving reach for general catalog ads.

Example C — B2B SaaS using lead gen and content distribution

Situation: Brand safety is less of a concern, but certain industry forums produce bot traffic and low-quality leads.

Decision: Use campaign-level exclusions to restrict content-distribution and retargeting campaigns while adding recurring account-level exclusions only if the bot-related placements reappear across many campaigns over time.

Implementation checklist — how to operationalize exclusions without destroying performance

Use this technical checklist when you apply exclusions in ad platforms (Google Ads, DV360, Meta, etc.). Steps assume a multi-account or scaled ad operation.

Centralize documentation: Maintain a canonical exclusion registry (Google Sheet, tag-enabled CMS, or a governance tool) listing exclusion name, level (account/campaign), reason, owner, and date.
Prioritize: Tag exclusions as High/Medium/Low impact. High = legal/brand safety; Medium = poor performance across campaigns; Low = single-campaign test.
Approval workflow: Require legal/brand sign-off for account-level additions. Use email approvals or a lightweight workflow tool to avoid accidental blocks.
Audit before applying: Export a placement report and calculate spend/CTR/conv rate for each placement. Flag any removal that would cut >5–10% of historical reach without acceptable rationale.
Test via campaign splits: Create A/B campaign splits before broad account-level changes. Compare performance over at least two conversion windows.
Version control: Timestamp and keep previous lists so you can roll back quickly if automation reacts poorly.
Cross-platform alignment: Ensure your account-level lists match or map to other platforms' controls where possible (e.g., shared publisher lists or category blocks).

Pitfalls to avoid (and how to recover)

Even experienced teams make avoidable mistakes. Here are the common traps and recovery steps.

Overblocking good inventory
Problem: A well-intentioned account-level list removes high-performing placements, reducing reach and increasing CPA.

Recovery: Use recent placement performance to identify lost inventory. Reintroduce critical placements at campaign-level where control is needed and monitor for 14–28 days.
Unclear ownership
Problem: Teams add exclusions without coordination, creating overlapping lists and confusion.

Recovery: Implement the governance checklist and mandate owner tags. Consolidate duplicate lists quarterly.
Applying global blocks to regional exceptions
Problem: A region-specific sensitive publisher was added globally; the result was a huge reach drop in a growth market.

Recovery: Re-evaluate by region. Create region-specific campaign exclusions or use placement targeting that respects geography.
Failing to test before killing placements
Problem: Marketers remove a placement based on suspicion rather than data; later it’s revealed the placement drove incremental conversions.

Recovery: Run a controlled experiment next time — split traffic and measure lift before making account-level changes irreversible.

Monitoring, reporting and governance — keep controls agile

Good exclusion governance is ongoing, not one-time. Here are pragmatic monitoring actions you should schedule.

Weekly placement digest: Auto-export top 200 placements by spend and conversion metrics. Look for sudden spikes tied to new publishers or channels.
Monthly exclusion review: A cross-functional team reviews all account-level exclusions and approves additions or deletions.
Quarterly performance readout: Compare campaigns that opted out of account-level exclusions vs those that followed them. Use this to refine global blocks.
Alerting: Set automated alerts for unusual metrics (e.g., CTR > 3x baseline or conversion rates falling below a threshold) that may indicate fraud or low-quality inventory.

Cross-platform notes — not all platforms behave the same

Google Ads introduced account-level placement exclusions in 2026. Other platforms provide equivalent controls but with subtle differences:

Meta: Offers publisher lists and inventory filters though placement control is often managed differently for in-stream placements versus feed placements.
DV360 & Programmatic DSPs: Provide account-level and campaign-level blocking; DSPs may accept shared blocklists (e.g., IAB lists).
Connected TV & streaming: Inventory can be publisher- or channel-level; account-level blocks are powerful but can have major reach impact in CTV buys.

Recommendation: Map the control parity across your platforms and keep a single canonical blocklist that you sync (manually or via API) to each platform. This reduces management overhead and prevents gaps.

Mini case studies — what success looks like

Case study 1 — Global Retailer: Saved 18% of programmatic spend leakage

Context: A multinational retailer experienced brand adjacency issues and poor-quality traffic across regional campaigns. Action: The team created an account-level exclusion for clearly toxic publishers and consolidated campaign-level tests for borderline placements.

Outcome: Within 60 days they reduced wasted spend by ~18%, CPA improved 14%, and machine-learning campaigns stabilized because they had consistent guardrails.

Case study 2 — Mid-market SaaS: Preserved reach while stopping low-quality leads

Context: The SaaS company relied heavily on demand generation. Early attempts to apply account-level exclusions reduced lead volume dramatically.

Action: They rolled back to campaign-level exclusions for gated-content campaigns while keeping account-level blocks for fraud and illegal content. They ran a controlled A/B test to measure impact.

Outcome: Lead quality improved by 22% with only a 6% drop in volume — a net improvement in pipeline efficiency.

Quick decision cheat sheet (printable)

If it’s legal, brand safety, or regulatory: account-level.
If it’s regional, audience-specific, or part of a tactical test: campaign-level.
If automation runs the campaign (Performance Max, Demand Gen): prefer account-level guardrails but validate with tests.
If a placement’s problem is isolated to one campaign: campaign-level — test before global removal.
Always document who approved account-level exclusions.

Actionable takeaways — what to do this week

Run a 90-day placement report to identify top 200 placements by spend and conversions.
Create a single canonical exclusion registry (sheet or tool) and document existing account-level lists.
Approve and apply only high-impact account-level exclusions (legal/brand safety) this month; test other candidate blocks via campaign-level experiments for 4–6 weeks.
Implement weekly placement digests and a monthly governance review with cross-functional stakeholders.

Final recommendations

In 2026, with platforms like Google Ads offering account-level exclusions and automation eating up more of your budget decisions, the right approach is layered: use account-level exclusions for non-negotiable inventory and global guardrails, and use campaign-level exclusions for tactical controls, regional nuances and tests. Make the choice data-driven, documented and reversible.

Keep your guardrails tight enough to protect brand and budget, but loose enough to let machine learning discover efficient inventory. Follow the 7-step decision framework above, iterate quickly with controlled tests, and establish a governance cadence so exclusions become a strategic lever — not an administrative burden.

Call to action

Ready to audit your placements with a proven checklist? Download our free placement-exclusion playbook (includes a 7-step audit template and a governance spreadsheet) or book a 30-minute strategy review with our ad ops team. Start protecting brand safety and maximizing reach — with less manual work.

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.